Main content

Recommended videos

Highlights: Richmond v Carlton

11:17pm Mar 27, 2014

Malthouse rues costly mistakes

11:44pm Mar 27, 2014

WADA rules out footy amnesty

Matt Thompson  February 8, 2013 12:34 PM

Demetriou vows to catch drug cheats Sweeping new measures aimed at tackling drugs issue
There's no reason why you'd even consider it
THE boss of the World Anti-Doping Agency has ruled out an amnesty for footballers caught up in the drugs in sports scandal.

Instead, John Fahey has told AFL.com.au any player who's taken banned substances or is worried they may have should come forward.

"The penalty might be significantly less than waiting for them to come to you," Fahey said.

"Six months doesn't destroy a footballer's career, two years might."

"They've now got the incentive to take it into their own hands, if they know they were doing something wrong, even if they are not sure, talk to ASADA."

Mr Fahey said an amnesty was not the solution because Australian authorities have all the investigative powers they need.  

"There's no reason why you'd even consider it," Fahey said.  

"There is no provision now, we'd have to change the code."

Fahey has previously discussed an amnesty in drug-plagued cycling, but said he didn't believe such a "cone of silence" existed in Australian sport.

Former Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority chief executive Richard Ings backed up Fahey's message.

"An amnesty is out of the question, but every player who may be caught up in this, he's now got an opportunity if he's quick to get to ASADA," Ings told AFL.com.au.

There is no timeframe for ASADA investigation currently being conducted into Essendon's activities.

The tough WADA code insists individual athletes take personal responsibility for substances they take.

It means any AFL player proven to have taken banned substances faces the prospect of a lengthy suspension.

There are fears mass suspensions would cripple a football club.

Matt Thompson is a reporter for AFL Media. Follow him on Twitter @MattThompsonAFL