tmedia
Main content

Recommended videos

Highlights: Richmond v Carlton

11:17pm Mar 27, 2014

Malthouse rues costly mistakes

11:44pm Mar 27, 2014

Recommended articles

Sunday football as it happened

Sunday football as it happened

Recap Port's Showdown upset, plus big wins for the Hawks and Tigers

11:45am Apr 14, 2013

St Kilda v Richmond as it happened

St Kilda v Richmond as it happened

 Recap Friday night's MCG clash as the Tigers make their best start to a season in 16 years

04:00pm Apr 5, 2013

Carlton v Collingwood as it happened

Carlton v Collingwood as it happened

Recap Friday night's blockbuster as the Blues capitulate in front of 78,000 at the MCG

10:36pm Jul 5, 2013

Saturday football as it happened

Saturday football as it happened

Recap a day bookended by two major boilovers

01:00pm Mar 30, 2013

Fantasy review: round three

Fantasy review: round three

It was a tough round for AFL Fantasy coaches, Warnie writes

10:42pm Apr 6, 2014

Football world sends off Hafey in style

Football world sends off Hafey in style

Tom Hafey remembered as a great coach and a wonderful man

06:15pm May 19, 2014

AFL chides Channel Seven after controversial goal review in Hawks-Cats clash

Ben Collins  August 24, 2014 1:50 PM

Was this touched before it crossed the line? The goal review system provided more controversy in the third term between Hawthorn and Geelong
Hamish McIntosh was judged to have touched the ball before it fully crossed the line

Hamish McIntosh was judged to have touched the ball before it fully crossed the line

We need to have some conversations with the broadcaster to make sure they show the right angle
THE AFL has expressed its disappointment to Channel Seven over the treatment of a controversial goal review in Saturday night's Hawthorn-Geelong blockbuster that camera stills confirm was correct.
 
AFL football operations manager Mark Evans told AFL.com.au on Sunday that Seven had disrespected fans and had unfairly left the score reviewer open to criticism.
 
Evans said Seven had acknowledged it hadn't accurately portrayed the incident and would make an apology during its Sunday coverage.
 
Evans, who attended the clash, said it was also unfortunate that fans at the ground weren't shown the camera angle that confirmed the right decision had been made.
 
The video review went against the Hawks in their come-from-behind win over the Cats at the MCG.
 
Late in the third quarter of a typically titanic struggle between the premiership contenders, Hawthorn was nine points down and closing when a low set shot from veteran Sam Mitchell became the subject of conjecture.
 
Cats ruckman Hamish McIntosh jumped for the ball on the goal line and touched it with both hands at full stretch, sending the ball into a goalpost.
 
The goal umpire, who had been perfectly positioned straddling the goal line, called for a video review to determine whether the ball had crossed the line before hitting the post.
 
Following the review, Hawthorn was awarded a behind.
 
Seven showed two angles – one from a goalpost that suggested the Hawks should have been awarded a goal, and another inconclusive view from a camera on the goal umpire's hat.
 
At the ground, the only camera angle shown was the one in which the ball appeared to be over the goal line before McIntosh touched it.
 
When the review was completed, Hawks fans roared their disapproval, and Channel Seven commentators Brian Taylor and Luke Darcy also disagreed with the decision.
 
However, Evans was adamant the review outcome was correct.
 
"The goalpost cameras have a fish-eye lens which distorts close-up images. For reviews, we use the far-post camera, which is far more accurate," Evans told AFL.com.au.
 
"In the split-screen you can see the difference in perspective. It clearly shows that first contact is made with the ball before it completely crosses the line.
 
"We need to have some conversations with the broadcaster to make sure they show the right angle.
 
"They showed the close-up and a view from the goal umpire's hat, which we don't mind them showing because it illustrates how difficult a job the goal umpires have.
 
"But when there is such a close call, and the vision is available to show the strength of the system, we think that our fans deserve to be treated with more respect.
 
"Fans need to be provided with the same, accurate information that the reviewer is getting.
 
"We also had 70,000 fans at the game who missed that information, which was also unfortunate."
 
One goal line camera angle (below right) showed Mitchell's shot was a behind. Picture supplied




Evans said that a positive to emerge from the situation was "the quality of images that come from those high-definition (goalpost) cameras, which are probably better than some of the broadcast-quality cameras".
 
He also emphasised that the score review system has so far this season corrected 18 errors, while conceding operational problems had created three errors.
 
"On balance, it's shifted things to a much more accurate level. The challenge for us is to get rid of the three errors that we've made," he said.